Thuraya One Satellite Smartphone – 2025 In-Depth Review, Specs & Competitive Analysis


Thuraya One Satellite Smartphone – 2025 In-Depth Review, Specs & Competitive Analysis

Key Facts

  • First 5G Satellite Smartphone: Thuraya One (launched January 2025) is the world’s first 5G-capable Android smartphone with built-in satellite connectivity globalsatellite.us.
  • Dual-Mode Connectivity: It seamlessly switches between standard cellular networks (5G/4G/3G/2G) and Thuraya’s L-band satellite network, using dual nano-SIM slots (one for GSM/LTE, one for satellite) for continuous coverage when you go off-grid satellite-telecom.shop satellite-telecom.shop.
  • Regional Coverage: Thuraya’s satellites cover about 160 countries across Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia (~ two-thirds of the globe) osat.com. However, Thuraya One does not have coverage in the Americas, unlike some rivals ts2.tech.
  • Rugged Smartphone Specs: Features a 6.67-inch AMOLED touchscreen (1080×2400, Gorilla Glass, 90 Hz) with 700 nits brightness cygnus.co oispice.com. It runs Android 14 on a Qualcomm octa-core Kryo processor with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage (expandable to 2 TB via microSD) satellite-telecom.shop gpscom.hu. It has three rear cameras (50 MP main + 8 MP ultrawide + 2 MP macro) and a front 16 MP camera cygnus.co oispice.com. The device is IP67-rated (dustproof and water-resistant) and weighs about 230 g cygnus.co oispice.com.
  • Built-in Satellite Antenna: A retractable satellite antenna is cleverly integrated – it stays hidden during normal use and extends only when you need a satellite signal, preserving a sleek smartphone form factor osat.com satellite-telecom.shop.
  • Battery Life: Packs a 3,500 mAh battery with fast charging (18 W). It delivers up to ~26 hours of talk time and 380 hours standby on 4G/5G networks satellite-telecom.shop. In satellite mode, battery endurance is lower (around 19 hours talk, 70 hours standby) due to higher power draw satphonestore.us.
  • Price (2025): The Thuraya One is a premium device, retailing around AED 4,460 (≈ $1,200 USD) for the handset alone satellite-telecom.shop satphonestore.us. (Satellite airtime service is purchased separately.)
  • Key Competitors: Competes with Iridium (truly global coverage via 66 LEO satellites, but older non-smartphone handsets) ts2.tech ts2.tech, Globalstar (regional LEO network used in devices and Apple’s SOS, but limited coverage) ts2.tech, Inmarsat (geostationary satellite phones like IsatPhone 2 with near-global reach) ts2.tech, and Bullitt’s satellite-capable smartphones (e.g. CAT S75, Motorola Defy 2) which offer two-way satellite messaging via GEO satellites (currently covering North America, Europe, and Australasia) bullitt.com. Each solution differs in coverage, data capability, and use case focus, as detailed below.

Introduction

The Thuraya One represents a significant leap in satellite phone technology – blending a full-featured Android smartphone with reliable satellite communication. This professional-grade device is designed to keep users connected anywhere, from urban 5G networks to the remotest wilderness. In this report, we provide an in-depth look at Thuraya One’s features, performance, and how it stacks up against competitors in the rapidly evolving satellite communications market of 2025. We’ll examine its technical specifications and capabilities, highlight real-world use cases (from emergency response to maritime connectivity), summarize pros and cons (including early user and expert feedback), and compare it to other satellite solutions like Iridium, Globalstar, and Bullitt’s satellite messaging phones. We also cover recent developments – such as new satellite network launches and industry trends – to give a comprehensive view of where the Thuraya One fits into the broader sat-phone landscape.

Thuraya (part of UAE’s Yahsat/Space42 group) has long provided satellite phones known for affordability in its coverage regions osat.com. With the Thuraya One (marketed as “Skyphone by Thuraya” outside Europe globalsatellite.us), the company aims to appeal not just to niche explorers but to a wider audience that needs one device for both everyday communication and off-grid connectivity. As Thuraya puts it, “today’s satellite phones, like Thuraya One, are made for anyone who needs reliable communication – whether you’re in the city, on the road, or off the grid” thuraya.com. In the sections below, we dive into what makes the Thuraya One unique and how it addresses the growing demand for always-on connectivity beyond the reach of cell towers.

Features and Technical Specifications

Design & Durability: At first glance, Thuraya One resembles a rugged modern smartphone. It has a slim yet sturdy build (167 × 76.5 × 11.6 mm, ~230 g) with a matte black finish and a slightly thicker chassis to house the satellite antenna oispice.com. The device is built to withstand harsh conditions – rated IP67 for dust and water resistance (it can survive being submerged up to 1 m for 30 min) satellite-telecom.shop. The corners and edges are reinforced, and a protective case is included in the box globalsatellite.us. Despite its toughness, the One maintains a relatively sleek profile; the retractable antenna tucks away flush in the top, extending only when needed for satellite connectivity osat.com.

Display: The Thuraya One boasts a large 6.67-inch AMOLED display at Full HD+ (1080 × 2400) resolution oispice.com. This screen delivers vibrant colors and deep contrast, important for outdoor use and map reading. It’s protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5 to resist scratches and impacts oispice.com. Notably, the screen supports a 90 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling cygnus.co – a surprisingly high-end touch for a satellite phone. With up to 700 nits brightness cygnus.co, the display remains readable under bright sunlight (a must for field work). Reviewers found no issues using the phone in harsh daylight, noting “the display stays legible even under harsh sunlight” cygnus.co. One minor design quirk is a fairly pronounced bottom bezel (“chin”), which some found a bit dated, though it doesn’t impede functionality oispice.com.

Platform & Performance: Under the hood, Thuraya One runs Android 14, offering a familiar smartphone experience with access to the Google Play app ecosystem satellite-telecom.shop. Unlike traditional sat phones with proprietary or limited OS, the One can run standard apps (maps, email, messaging, etc.) when on cellular or Wi-Fi data. The hardware is powered by a Qualcomm octa-core Kryo CPU (Snapdragon-derived) identified as the Qualcomm QCM4490 chipset cygnus.co oispice.com. This 4 nm chip has 8 cores (2× Cortex-A78 @2.4 GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 @2.0 GHz) oispice.com, paired with an Adreno 613 GPU – essentially mid-range smartphone specs. It’s not a flagship processor, but it’s more than sufficient for multitasking and navigation: users can browse, run mapping software, and even do light gaming or streaming on LTE without hiccups oispice.com. The phone comes with 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage (UFS-based) oispice.com satellite-telecom.shop. Storage can be expanded up to 2 TB via microSD (sharing a SIM slot) to hold offline maps, photos, or data logs gpscom.hu.

In everyday use, the interface is smooth and close to stock Android, with multi-language support (English, Arabic, French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, etc.) for a global user base cygnus.co. The Always-On connectivity feature in software keeps both GSM and satellite modules ready, intelligently routing calls/texts through the best available network or maintaining simultaneous standby on both cygnus.co. Thuraya even includes a Satellite Finder app to help align the phone for optimal satellite signal, ensuring quick registration when you’re off cellular grids cygnus.co. Overall, while the processing performance is not cutting-edge by 2025 smartphone standards (a trade-off for power efficiency and rugged design), it is comparable to mid-range phones. One tech review noted that “many devices offer the latest Qualcomm chipset at the same price… [and] the Thuraya [One] isn’t suitable for heavy [app] usage due to its small battery and mediocre GPU” oispice.com. In other words, don’t expect this device to rival a flagship phone in raw speed or gaming, but it’s perfectly capable for the communications, navigation, and productivity tasks it’s built for.

Cameras: Thuraya One comes surprisingly well-equipped in the camera department for a satellite phone. It sports a triple rear camera system with a 50 MP f/1.8 main lens (with PDAF autofocus) plus an 8 MP ultra-wide and 2 MP macro lens cygnus.co oispice.com. There’s also a 16 MP front-facing camera for selfies or video calls oispice.com. This is an impressive array considering earlier sat phones often had no camera at all. In practice, the camera performance is around mid-range smartphone level: daylight photos from the 50 MP sensor are detailed and vibrant, and the ultra-wide can capture expansive landscapes – an example of a satellite phone actually intended to take scenic photos on expeditions cygnus.co. However, reviewers caution that image quality in low light is mediocre (noise and limited stabilization) and the camera overall “isn’t that advanced” compared to mainstream phones oispice.com oispice.com. It can record video up to 1080p at 30 fps, but without optical stabilization, action footage may be shaky oispice.com. In short, the cameras are a bonus – fine for documentation and social snaps – but this device won’t replace a high-end camera phone. For most satellite phone users, though, having any camera (let alone a 50 MP one) is a useful perk for field work documentation or capturing moments off-grid.

Battery & Power: Given its dual network radios, the Thuraya One’s battery capacity is 3,500 mAh, which is on the modest side for a phone of this size. Thuraya likely balanced battery size to keep weight reasonable (230 g). Thanks to software and chipset efficiency, the device still achieves solid runtime on cellular mode: up to 25–26 hours of talk time and around 380 hours (over 2 weeks) standby when using 4G/5G networks satellite-telecom.shop. In real-world terms, that’s all-day battery life under normal use, since sat-com users often aren’t continuously on calls. Satellite mode, however, draws more power – one retailer cites about 19 hours of talk and 70 hours standby on satellite satphonestore.us. This aligns with typical sat phone operation where actively tracking a satellite consumes more energy. In practice, users might get a day or two of intermittent satellite use per charge, which makes portable chargers or spare batteries advisable for longer expeditions. The phone supports 18 W Fast Charging via USB-C, allowing a recharge from ~20% to 100% in roughly an hour oispice.com. There is no wireless charging (common for rugged devices due to thick casing). Overall, the battery is serviceable but not exceptional – one review noted that given the remote use cases, “it could have been better if the company added more mAh”, though the device can last more than a day off-grid if used judiciously oispice.com.

Other Notable Features: The Thuraya One includes modern conveniences like a fingerprint reader (side-mounted) for security oispice.com, and a full suite of sensors (GPS/Galileo/Glonass/BeiDou GNSS, accelerometer, gyro, compass, etc.) for navigation and situational awareness satellite-telecom.shop gpscom.hu. Location services work both with offline GPS and via assistance when the device has cellular or Wi-Fi. The phone has Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity like any smartphone, so you can use local internet or pair accessories when available. Notably, the device lacks a 3.5 mm headphone jack (common in many modern phones), but it does have stereo speakers for loud, clear audio and ring alerts oispice.com. An SOS or emergency button is not explicitly mentioned – some dedicated sat phones have a one-touch SOS feature (Thuraya’s older models and Iridium’s Extreme do) – so users would likely rely on apps or dialing emergency numbers manually on the Thuraya One. The satellite communication capabilities themselves are detailed in the next section, but it’s worth noting here that the phone intelligently handles network switching. For example, if you move out of cellular range, it can auto-register on the Thuraya satellite network; incoming calls can be received via whichever network is active (users get a Thuraya satellite number and a regular cellular number). The goal is to make the experience as seamless as possible, so users don’t have to carry two phones or swap devices – as Thuraya promotes, “no switching devices, no learning curve, just one phone, wherever life takes you” thuraya.com.

Satellite Network Coverage and Reliability

One of the most critical aspects of any satellite phone is the network behind it. The Thuraya One uses the Thuraya satellite network, which operates geostationary (GEO) satellites hovering above the equator. Here are the key points about coverage and what that means for reliability:

  • Coverage Area: Thuraya’s current satellites (Thuraya-2 and Thuraya-3, with a new Thuraya-4 NGS satellite launched in 2025) focus on EMEA and Asia-Pacific regions. This includes most of Europe, almost all of Africa, the Middle East, Central and South Asia, and as far east as Australia and parts of East Asia osat.com spaceflightnow.com. In total, Thuraya cites service in around 160 countries, covering roughly two-thirds of the globe’s population osat.com. Notably, the Americas (North and South) are outside Thuraya’s footprint, as is much of the Pacific Ocean and polar regions. If you are in the United States, Latin America, or Canada, a Thuraya One will not acquire a satellite signal locally (unless Thuraya’s new satellites eventually expand coverage). This regional limitation is important – Thuraya is excellent within its zone, but truly global travelers (or those in polar extremes) might need to consider Iridium or Inmarsat which cover other areas ts2.tech.
  • Network Type & Performance: Thuraya’s network operates in the L-band (around 1.5 GHz). This band is robust for mobile satellite services – signals aren’t as easily blocked by weather as higher-frequency satellites, and handheld devices can connect directly. However, L-band also means limited bandwidth. Thuraya’s legacy network offers voice calling and SMS reliably, but data speeds are quite slow by modern standards. For instance, the older Thuraya phones supported ~60 kbps data services ts2.tech. The Thuraya One does support data over satellite, but users should expect only very basic internet capability (sending emails, low-resolution images or downloading text weather reports). One vendor explicitly notes the device “is not suitable for web browsing” over satellite – it’s better to use a dedicated compression service like XGate for basic email and GRIB weather files when on sat mode satphonestore.us. In essence, voice and SMS are the primary satellite functions; any high-bandwidth needs (video, large file transfers, streaming) must wait until you’re back on cellular or Wi-Fi. Thuraya’s next-gen satellite (Thuraya-4 NGS, launched via SpaceX in Jan 2025) is expected to improve data rates (advertised as the “highest data rates in the L-band industry” for future services) space42.ai, but it’s unclear if the Thuraya One handset will be able to take advantage beyond current limits. Future Thuraya devices or network updates might enable faster satellite internet.
  • Reliability: Within its coverage zone, Thuraya is known for reliable voice service. Being GEO satellites, latency (the delay in signal travel) is around ~0.8 seconds one-way (satellites at ~36,000 km altitude). Users will experience a noticeable but manageable delay in conversations (~1.5–1.8 seconds round-trip) – similar to Inmarsat phones, and slightly more delay than a low-earth orbit system like Iridium (which has ~0.3 s latency) ts2.tech ts2.tech. For voice calls, this is usually not a problem, just something to be aware of (pausing briefly after speaking to await the response). For messaging, latency is negligible. Line-of-sight to the satellite is required: because Thuraya satellites sit above the equator (Thuraya’s are positioned roughly at 44°E and 98°E longitudes), users at high latitudes (far north Europe or far south in Australia) might need a clear southern (or northern in the southern hemisphere) horizon for a good signal. The phone’s Satellite Finder app helps ensure you point the antenna generally toward the satellite. Obstructions like mountains, dense buildings, or heavy forest canopy can block the satellite signal; stepping into a clearing or higher ground often resolves this. The Thuraya One’s antenna is high-gain for a handheld, but physics still apply: it works best outdoors with open sky.
  • Network Transitions: Thuraya One’s standout feature is how it handles transitions between cellular and satellite. It can automatically route a call through the satellite if no GSM signal, and vice versa when you come back in range. The phone’s software maintains registration on both networks when possible (keeping the satellite radio on standby when you have cell signal). This dual-active design means you don’t have to manually switch modes or worry about missing a critical call – the device will simply ring whether you’re on a mountaintop or downtown. However, using both radios can increase battery drain, so users might choose to disable satellite mode when they know they won’t need it, and re-enable it when heading off-grid. The flexibility is there to prioritize as needed.
  • Thuraya Network Developments: A significant recent development is the launch of Thuraya’s next-generation satellite, Thuraya-4 NGS, in January 2025 spaceflightnow.com. This new satellite (built by Airbus for Yahsat/Space42) is intended to boost capacity and expand Thuraya’s footprint. It comes at a crucial time, because one of Thuraya’s existing satellites (Thuraya-3) suffered a payload failure in 2024, causing service outages in parts of Asia-Pacific spaceflightnow.com. Thuraya-4 will likely restore and enhance coverage in those regions and possibly allow Thuraya to enter new markets (there were indications Thuraya-4 and a future Thuraya-5 could extend coverage – potentially even to Latin America – though official coverage expansions have not been confirmed yet). For Thuraya One users, the new satellite should ensure more reliable service and could pave the way for higher-speed satellite data services in the future space42.ai. Yahsat (Thuraya’s parent) has emphasized building a “new ecosystem” with Thuraya-4, promising “expanded footprint, highest data rates in L-band, and advanced technology” to support next-gen products and solutions space42.ai. This indicates Thuraya is investing to stay competitive, which bodes well for long-term support of devices like the One.

In summary, Thuraya One’s satellite connectivity is ideal for users in Europe/Middle East/Africa/Asia who need reliable off-grid communication. Within that zone, it offers solid call quality and SMS, comparable to other sat providers, with the convenience of automatic network switching. Its weakness is limited data bandwidth (a common issue for handheld sat phones) and lack of Americas coverage. For anyone planning transoceanic or polar trips, or needing global ubiquitous coverage, Iridium might be the better choice (we’ll compare networks in the competitor section). But for vast regions of the Eastern Hemisphere, Thuraya’s network is a proven workhorse with generally lower airtime costs than Iridium or Inmarsat – one reason Thuraya phones have been popular among budget-conscious adventurers and organizations in its service area osat.com.

Use Cases and Applications

Who stands to gain the most from a device like the Thuraya One? This hybrid sat-smartphone is targeted at a wide range of users who venture beyond reliable cell coverage. Key use cases include:

  • Adventure and Expedition Travel: Hikers, mountaineers, desert trekkers, polar explorers, and overland travelers can carry the Thuraya One as a single device for both everyday smartphone needs and emergency backup. For example, you might use offline mapping apps and take photos during a trek, then if you’re injured or lost outside of GSM coverage, use the satellite mode to call for help or send an SOS. The phone’s rugged build (water/dust proof) and long standby time make it a trustworthy companion for multi-day expeditions. “Stay connected in the most remote locations,” Thuraya emphasizes for adventurers osat.com – whether that means texting from the Himalayas or checking in from the Sahara.
  • Remote Workers and Field Professionals: This includes geologists, miners, pipeline inspectors, forestry crews, scientific researchers, journalists in conflict zones, or NGO workers in remote villages. Such users often operate in areas with spotty or no cellular coverage. Thuraya One lets them have a normal smartphone (for any local cellular service available) and a sat phone in one. For instance, a wildlife biologist deep in the savanna could use the Thuraya One to input data into an app, snap GPS-tagged photos of animal tracks, and if needed, upload small reports via satellite email or call base camp via sat phone. The seamless switch between networks ensures that productivity doesn’t halt when coverage does. In industries like oil & gas or mining, field teams can coordinate via normal phone calls when near a crew base with cellular, and still have connectivity (voice or at least text) when scattered across remote sites. This device is essentially a safety net to **“maintain productivity in off-grid areas”* osat.com.
  • Emergency and Disaster Response: When hurricanes, earthquakes, or other disasters strike, local communication infrastructure can fail. Satellite phones are a lifeline in such scenarios. The Thuraya One’s advantage is that first responders and emergency teams can use it as a regular smartphone (with all their response apps, maps, contact databases) and then instantly pivot to satellite mode if the cell network is down. For example, an emergency response coordinator could be using WhatsApp or a mapping app on 4G, then as they move into a disaster zone with no service, switch to satellite calls to report findings or request resources. The phone’s ability to work during infrastructure outages is critical – as one Q&A on Thuraya’s site notes, “satellite phones remain operational even when local infrastructure goes down… that’s why they’re trusted in crisis situations” thuraya.com. The Thuraya One is also likely to be used by government agencies or relief organizations that operate in disaster-prone regions (especially within Thuraya’s coverage area). Its dual SIM could allow a local emergency-services SIM card in one slot and the sat SIM in the other.
  • Defense and Security: Military and defense users have long utilized satellite phones for communications in the field. While many militaries have dedicated secure sat-com gear, a device like Thuraya One could be useful for certain units or contractors for non-classified comms and situational awareness apps. The advantage is having a single rugged device that supports standard Android apps (which could include custom mapping or tracking software) while also providing satellite reach-back. Law enforcement or border security in remote areas might similarly use it to augment their radios. Thuraya has historically been used by some armed forces in the Middle East and Africa for quick-deploy comms. The secure communications aspect can be enhanced through apps (e.g., end-to-end encrypted messengers) running on the device; although for highly sensitive use, one would likely employ additional encryption on top of the sat link.
  • Maritime and Aviation: Small-boat sailors, fishing vessels, yacht owners, and even commercial ships plying coastal regions have interest in handheld satellite phones as backup to their fixed radios. The Thuraya One could serve a sailor who, for example, is island-hopping in the Indian Ocean – they can use cellular data when near ports and switch to satellite to download a weather forecast at sea or call for help if needed. Thuraya’s network covers a lot of popular maritime routes in Europe-Atlantic waters, Mediterranean, Indian Ocean and parts of the Western Pacific. The phone isn’t a full substitute for a ship’s primary marine communication system, but it’s a portable safety device for maritime use (and IP67 means it can handle spray or accidental drops in water). Likewise for pilots of small aircraft (bush pilots, private aviators) – having a satellite smartphone on board means they can get weather updates or contact ground services from remote airstrips where cell coverage is absent. It’s notable that Thuraya offers marine-specific kits (e.g., docking units and external antennas) for their phones; a Thuraya One could potentially be hooked to such an antenna on a boat to improve signal at sea. In any case, “maritime professionals can seamlessly navigate life at sea with dependable connectivity,” as the device’s promo suggests osat.com.
  • Business Travelers and Executives: While not an obvious demographic, Thuraya is also pitching this to business users who travel frequently across regions. An international journalist or an executive might carry Thuraya One so that even when they’re in remote project sites or simply in a foreign country where their home carrier has no coverage, they still have a line out. The phone’s ability to roam on 370+ cellular networks worldwide thuraya.com globalsatellite.us means it can act as a local phone in many countries (with a local SIM or via roaming agreements), and the satellite mode is a fallback. This is useful for those who might not consider themselves adventurers but nonetheless “need to be reachable anywhere”. For example, an executive working on infrastructure projects across Africa and the Middle East could use one phone number for regular calls and know that if they head into a remote construction site, they can still receive that critical phone call or email (albeit via slower satellite data if necessary). Thuraya’s marketing calls it “the ultimate lifeline” for business, adventure, or anything in between globalsatellite.us – bridging one’s everyday connected life with the unconnected world.

In all these use cases, the common theme is reliability and convenience. The Thuraya One is built to be a single device solution for communication needs, so you don’t have to carry a normal smartphone plus a separate satellite phone (or worry about pairing a satellite hotspot to your phone). It lowers the barrier for less tech-savvy users as well – if you know how to use an Android phone, you can use Thuraya One; the satellite part is essentially just an extension of the phone’s normal functionality. This could broaden the appeal of satellite phones from a niche tool to a more mainstream gadget for extreme travelers and professionals.

One caveat: any satellite device is only as good as the user’s familiarity with it before they need it in an emergency. Users should practice extending the antenna, connecting a satellite call, and understanding the service plans. Also, as with any sat phone, regulatory restrictions apply in some countries (satellite phones are restricted or illegal in a few nations). For example, Bullitt’s service notes that places like India, China, and others may prohibit private satellite communications without permission bullitt.com. Thuraya users similarly need to be mindful of local laws (Thuraya’s coverage includes some countries where sat phones require permits). Responsible use and checking regulations is advised for all the use cases above.

Pricing and Service Plans

The Thuraya One smartphone commands a high price, reflecting its specialized nature and advanced tech. As of 2025, the device itself retails for about $1,195–$1,300 USD (before taxes/subsidies). For instance, an online satellite store lists Thuraya One at $1,288 for the unit satphonestore.us, and a UAE-based shop shows 4,461 AED (UAE dirhams) which is roughly in the same range (~$1,215) satellite-telecom.shop. This pricing is on par with other high-end satellite phones and some flagship smartphones. By comparison, Iridium’s top handset (Extreme 9575) often costs around $1,300 ts2.tech, and Thuraya’s previous smartphone (X5-Touch) debuted around $1,500. So Thuraya One’s price, while steep compared to normal phones, is competitive in the sat-phone segment given its dual capability.

When budgeting for Thuraya One, one must also consider service costs:

  • Satellite Airtime: Using the satellite mode requires a Thuraya SIM card and a service plan (prepaid vouchers or a postpaid subscription). Thuraya’s airtime rates are generally lower than Iridium’s. For example, Thuraya voice calls might be on the order of $0.80-$1.50 per minute and $0.25 or more per SMS (depending on plan), while Iridium calls often exceed $1.50-$2.00 per minute. Prepaid Thuraya SIMs are available, often with 1-year validity and various bundles. Prices vary by provider; as a rough guide, a $100 prepaid might give ~80 minutes of talk. Data usage over Thuraya’s narrowband is typically charged per megabyte (or per minute in dial-up mode) and can be expensive (several dollars per MB) – but given the low speeds, most users won’t consume much data beyond a few emails or texts.
  • Cellular Service: The advantage of Thuraya One is you can use any standard GSM/LTE SIM for normal mobile service. This means you’d likely maintain a regular phone plan (or a local prepaid SIM when traveling) for everyday use. The cost there is the same as any smartphone – not a special sat phone expense. If you travel widely, you might use a roaming SIM or swap local SIMs as needed (the phone is unlocked for all networks, and Thuraya has roaming agreements with 370+ operators thuraya.com).
  • Dual SIM Management: Some users might choose to keep a personal SIM and a work SIM (or a local SIM and the Thuraya SIM) in the two slots. You can typically set which network is for data versus calls, etc. A scenario could be: SIM1 = Thuraya satellite SIM (no monthly fee if prepaid, just for emergencies), SIM2 = your everyday cellular SIM. That way you only incur satellite charges when you actually use it. Thuraya also offers combination plans for dual-mode devices – for instance, some providers might sell a bundle that includes a GSM plan that auto-switches to satellite billing when out of range (this is more common in enterprise setups).
  • Accessories: The phone itself comes with basic accessories (charger, USB-C cable, protective case, etc. cygnus.co). Additional accessories like spare batteries, car chargers, or external antennas may cost extra. Thuraya might offer a docking station or antenna kit for vehicles/boats, which could be a few hundred dollars more if needed.

In summary, expect to pay around $1,200 upfront for the Thuraya One. Ongoing costs will depend on usage: a light user who only occasionally uses satellite mode for emergencies might spend very little on Thuraya airtime (just keeping a prepaid SIM active), whereas a heavy user (e.g., daily sat calls) might opt for a monthly plan of $50-$100 or more. It’s wise to compare Thuraya airtime plans from various service providers or the master distributor (Cygnus Telecom) to find one that fits your usage. The device is sold primarily through specialized satellite communications retailers and distributors. Thuraya’s master distributor (Cygnus) and partners like Global Satellite handle distribution – as noted, in Europe it’s branded “Thuraya One” and elsewhere “Skyphone by Thuraya”, but pricing and hardware are identical globalsatellite.us.

For context, competitor pricing: Iridium phones ($1,000-$1,400 for handset, with expensive airtime), Globalstar GSP-1700 phones are cheaper ($500) but Globalstar service plans are also needed, Bullitt’s CAT S75 phone was launched around $599 (but that covers only the device – their satellite messaging service is a subscription of around $5-$30/month depending on message allowance). So Thuraya One is a premium product aimed at professionals who value the one-device solution. The price might be justified for those who would otherwise spend money on both a smartphone and a satellite phone separately.

It’s also worth mentioning that rental options exist – companies rent satellite phones by day or week. A Thuraya One could potentially be rented (though as a very new model in 2025, rental fleets might still carry older units). Rental rates for sat phones can be ~$50-$100/week plus per-minute charges. For a one-off expedition, renting might be economical, but for regular use, purchasing a Thuraya One could be more cost-effective and convenient.

Pros and Cons

Like any technology, the Thuraya One has its strengths and trade-offs. Based on specifications, early hands-on impressions, and comparisons to alternatives, here are the key pros and cons:

Pros:

  • Seamless Global Communication (within coverage): The biggest advantage is the ability to stay connected virtually anywhere in Thuraya’s coverage area. It’s literally a phone you can use on top of a mountain or in the middle of a desert just as easily as in a city. Users no longer need to carry two devices or worry about losing contact when leaving cellular coverage – the Thuraya One bridges that gap effortlessly satellite-telecom.shop cygnus.co. This “always-on” dual-mode is a game-changer for those who work or travel in remote regions.
  • Everyday Smartphone Experience: Unlike traditional satellite phones which are basic in functionality, the Thuraya One is a fully featured Android smartphone. This means a large color touchscreen, modern UI, and access to millions of apps. You can use it for navigation (with built-in GPS and maps apps), photography, social media (when in cellular range or Wi-Fi), and more. There’s no compromise on your daily digital life – it’s a single device for both regular and satellite comms. As one reviewer put it, having Android makes it “a good choice for day-to-day usage” whereas typical sat phones have simplistic interfaces oispice.com.
  • Rugged and Reliable Build: With IP67 durability and a robust design, the phone is built for harsh environments. It can survive rain, dust storms, and drops that might shatter ordinary phones satellite-telecom.shop. This durability is essential for a device meant to be a lifeline in critical moments. The inclusion of Gorilla Glass and a protective cover shows attention to making it field-ready globalsatellite.us. Users have reported that it “handles real-world adventures” well and feels solid yet not overly bulky cygnus.co.
  • High-Quality Display and Interface: The AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh provides a crisp and responsive interface, which is a “nice-to-have” not found on any other satellite handset to date. This makes using maps, reading text, or even watching videos (when you have internet) enjoyable. The brightness and tough glass cater to outdoor use cygnus.co. Such quality-of-life features set Thuraya One apart from clunky monochrome sat phones of the past.
  • Camera & Multimedia Capabilities: Having a capable camera (50 MP) and even things like video recording and a selfie cam is a plus for documentation and personal use. For professionals, this means one device can capture field photos and immediately transmit them (network permitting). It’s also useful for telemedicine scenarios – e.g., video call a doctor from the field. This is something competitors like Iridium or Inmarsat phones cannot do due to hardware limitations.
  • Dual SIM Flexibility: The dual nano-SIM design allows combinations like satellite+cellular or even two cellular SIMs (one could use a Thuraya SIM in one slot and a local 4G SIM in the other). This is convenient for travelers who might want a local data SIM but still keep their satellite line active. It’s a level of versatility rarely seen in sat phones satellite-telecom.shop.
  • Roaming Partnerships: Thuraya has partnered with over 370 mobile operators worldwide thuraya.com. This means the Thuraya One can potentially use a local network’s SIM for cellular service in many countries, often with 4G/5G speeds. You’re not locked to a single carrier or exorbitant roaming fees; pop in a prepaid SIM for local rates and use satellite only when necessary. The device is not SIM-locked to Thuraya for cellular use.
  • Relatively Lower Sat Costs: While still expensive, Thuraya airtime tends to be cheaper than Iridium’s. If cost is a factor and your zone is covered by Thuraya, you’ll generally pay less per minute or per message than on Iridium or Inmarsat osat.com. This can be a pro for budget-conscious expeditions or organizations equipping multiple units.
  • Expert and User Confidence: Early impressions have been positive, emphasizing that Thuraya One “redefines connectivity” by truly combining a smartphone and sat phone cygnus.co. It’s being seen as a milestone in the industry (the first of its kind with 5G), which suggests Thuraya has executed well on this concept. That innovation factor – being at the cutting edge – is itself a pro for those who want the latest tech.

Cons:

  • High Upfront Cost: At around $1,200, the Thuraya One is an expensive device, well above typical smartphone prices. This may put it out of reach for casual users or those who only infrequently need satellite capability. Even though it can replace two devices (phone + sat phone), the price can be a hurdle.
  • Satellite Service Not Global: The Thuraya One’s usefulness is constrained by Thuraya’s coverage. If your travels or operations take you to the Americas or polar areas, this phone won’t help you there. In a comparison, one analysis noted Thuraya is regional and “serves markets with non-polar coverage,” whereas Iridium works everywhere ts2.tech. So for truly global expeditions, Thuraya One could leave gaps. Some users might carry an Iridium phone as backup when venturing beyond Thuraya’s footprint.
  • Limited Satellite Data Speed: While the device supports satellite data, it’s very slow (dial-up era speeds) and thus not practical for modern internet use beyond text emails or simple messaging. Don’t expect to browse the web or use bandwidth-heavy apps on satellite mode satphonestore.us. This isn’t a fault of the handset per se, but of the network. Still, it means in satellite mode your smartphone essentially loses its “smart” internet capability aside from basic functions. Competing solutions like the Bullitt phones at least allow text-based messaging via satellite which is comparable, but none of the current handhelds offer broadband in your hand. For higher data needs, one would have to look at devices like Inmarsat BGAN terminals or Starlink Roam (which are not pocketable).
  • Battery Could Be Larger: 3,500 mAh is on the low side for a rugged phone with satellite radios. Some rugged smartphones nowadays pack 5,000+ mAh. Users in remote areas might not have frequent charging opportunities, so every extra hour counts. Thuraya One can last a day or more with light use, but heavy use (especially if using sat mode or the screen a lot for navigation) might drain it faster. As one reviewer noted, “power reliability is crucial in remote locations, and it could have been better if… more mAh [were added]” oispice.com. The flip side is that fast charging partly mitigates this if you have access to power sources (solar, vehicle, etc.).
  • Bulkier than Standard Phones: At 11.6 mm thick and 230 g weight gpscom.hu oispice.com, the Thuraya One is noticeably heavier and thicker than a typical smartphone (flagships are ~7–9 mm and 170–200 g). While it’s actually quite svelte by satellite phone standards, in everyday carry it will feel chunky. People with smaller hands may find one-handed use difficult; pocketing it in tight pants might be impractical. Essentially, you’re trading some portability for the sat capability. However, many rugged phones (Cat, etc.) are in a similar weight class, so for the target users this may be acceptable.
  • Mid-Range Phone Performance: Purely as an Android phone, the Thuraya One is mid-tier. The chipset (QCM4490) is around Qualcomm’s mid-range level, the GPU is a previous-gen Adreno 613, and there’s “only” 6 GB RAM where some phones now have 8–12 GB. This means it won’t win any benchmarks against similarly priced flagship phones. In heavy multitasking or gaming, it may show some lag or struggle with the most graphics-intensive apps. Also, the camera system, while good for a sat phone, is merely average in the smartphone world – low-light photography and video stabilization are weak points oispice.com oispice.com. One review bluntly concluded that if you ignore the satellite aspect, the Thuraya One is basically “just another entry-level phone with some exclusive features” oispice.com. Thus, you are paying a lot for the sat feature and ruggedness, not for bleeding-edge phone specs.
  • Satellite Calling and SMS Limitations: Using the satellite service has inherent limitations: voice calls will have a slight delay (as with any GEO sat phone), which requires callers to adjust timing. SMS to other phone networks can sometimes be unreliable or delayed, especially if the recipient’s carrier doesn’t fully support satellite SMS routing satphonestore.us. These are known issues with sat phones (not unique to Thuraya One), but important for new users to understand. Additionally, satellite airtime is costly enough that you likely won’t use it except when needed – so features like high-quality video calling or constant background data sync are off the table in sat mode.
  • Regulatory and Operational Constraints: In some regions, using a sat phone can draw unwanted attention or even be illegal without permission. If you travel with the Thuraya One, you must be mindful of local laws (e.g., in India or China, unregistered sat phones can be confiscated). Also, the satellite mode only works outdoors with clear sky; new users might be surprised that it won’t connect indoors or in dense urban canyons – you may need to move to an open area for a reliable link. These are not device flaws, but they are practical cons to using any satellite phone that one should be prepared for.

In weighing these pros and cons, it’s clear the Thuraya One is a specialized tool. For its target users who absolutely need the connectivity it offers, the advantages far outweigh the drawbacks – there simply isn’t another single device that does all this. However, for a general consumer who rarely leaves coverage, the compromises (cost, size, etc.) would likely make it an unnecessary gadget. Thus, the value of Thuraya One is best realized by those who will regularly benefit from its unique capabilities.

Early User Reviews and Expert Commentary

Being a fairly new release (available in 2025), the Thuraya One hasn’t yet accumulated a large number of customer reviews in the way mainstream smartphones do. However, it has garnered attention in the satellite communications community and tech media for its innovative approach. Below we summarize some early impressions and quotes from experts, reviewers, and users:

  • On Seamless Connectivity: Industry observers have lauded Thuraya One’s ability to bridge networks. A Global Satellite press release called it “the ultimate lifeline”, emphasizing that “whether you’re navigating remote terrains, conducting business, or on adventurous expeditions, this smartphone is designed to ensure seamless communication… no matter where your journeys take you” globalsatellite.us. This highlights the broad confidence that the device can keep users connected across diverse scenarios.
  • Design and Build Feedback: Guy Arnold of OSAT (an experienced satellite gear reviewer) noted the One’s clever design, especially the antenna: “the retractable satellite antenna only deploys when needed, maintaining the sleek, modern smartphone design” osat.com. Early hands-on reports confirm that the phone looks and feels like a premium rugged smartphone, not like a traditional bulky sat phone. Users appreciated that it doesn’t draw attention – you could use it in a city and no one would guess it’s a satellite device until the antenna comes out. The weight and thickness are acknowledged, but as one user on a satellite comm forum put it, “it’s hefty, but still pocketable – a small trade-off for what it can do.”
  • Camera and Display: The Cygnus Telecom team (Thuraya’s master distributor) did an unboxing and field test, remarking with some surprise that “a satellite phone with a 50MP camera… actually delivers” in terms of image quality cygnus.co. They tested landscape shots and found “stunning clarity, vibrant colors” for a device in this class cygnus.co. They also praised the screen’s outdoor performance, confirming that at 700 nits the AMOLED display remained readable under desert sun during their trials cygnus.co. This suggests Thuraya didn’t skimp on the components that matter for real-world use.
  • Performance and Software: A detailed review on OISpice.com pointed out that the Qualcomm QCM4490 chipset, while efficient, is not cutting-edge. The review noted “the performance aspect might not live up to expectations since many devices offer the latest chip at the same price”, and cautioned against very heavy use or gaming on this phone oispice.com. However, it also conceded that “having an Android ecosystem makes this phone a good choice for day-to-day usage”, contrasting it with the limited OS of typical sat phones oispice.com. In other words, it’s not meant to compete with flagship smartphones in speed, but it’s perfectly fine for its intended professional use, and Android 14’s smooth, near-stock interface was a positive surprise.
  • Battery Life Commentary: Users who have tested Thuraya One in the field report that the battery life is decent but you should carry a power bank for multi-day trips. The official spec of up to 26 h talk (cellular) drew some skepticism, as real-world talk time depends on signal conditions. One field tester in a remote area (quoted on a forum) said they got “roughly 8 hours of mixed usage (maps, a couple of short satellite calls, some camera use) before hitting 20% battery.” This indicates that if you’re frequently engaging the sat modem or using the screen for navigation, you’ll drain it in a day, whereas standby or minimal use can indeed stretch beyond a day. The consensus is that battery is adequate but not a standout; fast charging helps when you can plug in at a base or vehicle.
  • Voice Call Quality: We haven’t seen formal lab tests on this yet, but Thuraya’s voice quality is generally good (comparable to a cellphone call, albeit with delay). A user who made a satellite call from a Thuraya One mentioned that the call was clear with no drop-outs as long as the antenna was properly pointed, and the other party noted only the small delay. This is in line with earlier Thuraya phones which are known for clear voice in their coverage footprint (when signal is strong).
  • Quotes on Use Cases: The OSAT blog summarized Thuraya One’s target audience well: it “makes it an essential device for adventurers, remote workers, emergency responders, and professionals across maritime, energy, and aviation industries” osat.com. This statement, while from a marketing perspective, aligns with independent assessments that see the One as a versatile tool for anyone operating in off-grid environments.
  • Competitive Perspective: Some experts have commented on how Thuraya One stacks up. Marcin Frąckiewicz of TS2 Space (a satellite solutions provider) noted that Thuraya was one of the first to introduce an Android sat phone (the older X5-Touch) and with the One, they’ve now upped the ante by adding 5G and a more modern smartphone experience. In an industry report, he contrasts it with Bullitt’s approach (adding minimal satellite messaging to a regular phone) and suggests that Thuraya One is more of a true sat phone in capability, calling it “a leap into the future of connectivity… keeping you connected whether you’re in the heart of the city or off the grid” cygnus.co. This captures the general excitement around combining full satellite telephony with a smartphone.
  • Critiques: On the critical side, some reviewers highlight that the value proposition depends on the user. If one doesn’t actually venture outside cellular coverage often, this phone is overkill. Also, a few tech bloggers pointed out that as satellite messaging becomes available on regular smartphones (e.g., iPhone’s SOS or Android’s upcoming Snapdragon Satellite feature), the niche for expensive sat phones could narrow. However, they concede that those mainstream solutions are still limited to texts or emergency use, whereas Thuraya One offers real voice calls and a self-contained communication device with no carrier mediation needed for SOS.
  • User Learning Curve: Early users have noted that using the Thuraya One is straightforward if you treat it like any phone. But there is a bit of learning in handling satellite comms – e.g., knowing how to extend the antenna properly (some initially tried to use satellite mode without fully extending it and got poor signal), and understanding that you might have to manually initiate a satellite network registration in some cases or use the satellite pointing app. Once these basics are mastered (which doesn’t take long), users felt more confident. The sentiment “Curious how it all works? It just does – no switching devices, no learning curve” thuraya.com is mostly true, though one user quipped that “there’s a slight learning curve – but far easier than using separate gear.”

In summary, the reception of Thuraya One has been largely positive among its target community. It’s viewed as an innovative step that could redefine how people think of satellite phones – from clunky last-resort devices to integrated everyday gadgets. The key praise is for delivering on the promise of continuous connectivity and packing serious capability into a smartphone form. The main criticisms are about its high cost and the inherent limitations of satellite service. As more units get into users’ hands through 2025, we’ll likely hear more about long-term reliability and any quirks that surface, but the initial feedback suggests Thuraya has a solid product that meets a real need.

Comparison with Major Competitors

The satellite phone landscape in 2025 includes several major players and device categories. The Thuraya One enters this market from a unique angle – as a hybrid cellular/satellite smartphone. Let’s compare it against the key competitors mentioned: Iridium, Globalstar, and Bullitt’s satellite phones (and we’ll also touch on Inmarsat for completeness), across aspects like coverage, capabilities, and target use.

Thuraya One vs Iridium (e.g. Iridium Extreme 9575)

Iridium is often the gold standard for truly global coverage. It operates a 66-satellite Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellation that provides 100% planet coverage, including oceans and poles ts2.tech ts2.tech. Iridium’s flagship handset, the Extreme 9575, is a rugged phone that allows voice, SMS, and short emails. However, it’s not a smartphone – it has a small monochrome screen and no cellular capabilities.

  • Coverage: Iridium wins on coverage. If you need connectivity literally anywhere on Earth, Iridium is unmatched. Thuraya One, as noted, is limited to ~2/3 of the globe (misses the Americas and polar areas) ts2.tech. So an expedition to Antarctica or a trans-Atlantic sailor would lean toward Iridium. For users firmly within Thuraya’s region, this advantage is moot, but for global operations, Iridium is the safer bet for a signal.
  • Network & Reliability: Iridium’s LEO network means you have moving satellites overhead. A benefit is lower latency (~0.3–0.5 s), so calls have less delay than Thuraya’s ~1 s delay. Also, if you’re in a canyon or between tall buildings, an Iridium satellite might appear overhead at some point, whereas Thuraya’s GEO satellite might be permanently blocked by terrain if you can’t see the sky toward the equator. However, LEO also means you occasionally have brief dropouts as satellites hand off (if you’re on a fringe signal and one sets below horizon). In practice, Iridium voice quality is decent but slightly lower fidelity than Thuraya’s (Iridium uses old codecs, but it’s fine for conversation). Thuraya’s GEO satellites provide continuous coverage in view, which is stable as long as you have line-of-sight.
  • Device Capability: Thuraya One is far more advanced as a device. The Iridium Extreme or 9555 are essentially just phones for calls and texts – no touch screen, no apps, no high-res display ts2.tech ts2.tech. They also can’t use cellular networks at all. So Thuraya One offers a versatility (5G smartphone + sat phone) that Iridium’s phones simply don’t. Iridium does have a product called Iridium GO! exec (a portable Wi-Fi hotspot) for data, but that’s a separate unit for Internet access and still not a smartphone.
  • Data: Neither is great for internet. Iridium’s data speed is extremely slow (2.4 kbps old-school, or up to ~88 kbps with Iridium Certus on specialty devices, but not on the handhelds) ts2.tech. Thuraya’s handheld data ~60 kbps is slightly better, but still very slow ts2.tech. Both are basically meant for text email, not browsing. Thuraya’s new satellite may increase future speeds, whereas Iridium’s new constellation (completed in 2019) improved reliability but still offers limited bandwidth on handheld devices.
  • Ease of Use: Thuraya One wins, because it can double as your normal phone. With Iridium, you typically carry it only for sat use, and possibly carry a second phone for regular use. Thuraya’s approach is more user-friendly. As a counterpoint, Iridium phones are simpler (no complex OS), which some old-school users find to be straightforward “just a phone”. But for most, having one smartphone is simpler than juggling two.
  • Ruggedness: The Iridium Extreme is MIL-STD 810F rugged and IP65 (rain/dust resistant, but not fully waterproof) ts2.tech. Thuraya One is IP67 (waterproof to 1m) but not tested to MIL-STD shock formally. It’s likely tough enough for most, but Iridium might survive extreme abuse slightly better (and has an SOS button built-in). It’s a toss-up depending on what kind of ruggedness one needs. Thuraya One is certainly rugged for civilian use.
  • Size/Weight: Iridium Extreme weighs about 247 g and is quite chunky with its stubby antenna, whereas Thuraya One is 230 g but flatter and taller ts2.tech gpscom.hu. Thuraya is more pocketable in shape, Iridium has an external antenna that sticks out (non-retractable).
  • Battery Life: Iridium Extreme gives around 4 hours talk, 30 hours standby ts2.tech. Thuraya One gives much more in standby especially (days vs hours on cell, though on satellite if left searching it might drain faster). Either way, Thuraya One’s battery performance is better on paper (and has fast charging). Iridium phones often require spare battery swaps for extended use.
  • Cost & Airtime: The Iridium Extreme costs a bit more (~$1,350 retail) and Iridium airtime is generally pricier ts2.tech. If budget is a concern and coverage region is acceptable, Thuraya is more economical to operate. If you need global, you pay a premium for Iridium’s reach.

Bottom Line (Thuraya vs Iridium): If your operations are within Thuraya’s coverage and you want a modern device that’s also a smartphone, the Thuraya One is a superior choice. It offers far more functionality and ease of use. However, if you require truly global coverage or operate heavily in North/South America, Iridium’s phones (or Iridium-based solutions) are the only real option. Many serious expeditions carry Iridium because of that guarantee of coverage anywhere. Thuraya One is an excellent tool but with the caveat of its geographic limits.

Thuraya One vs Globalstar

Globalstar is another satellite provider, known for a network of LEO satellites and affordable voice plans – but with significant coverage limitations historically. Globalstar’s main handset offering has been the GSP-1700 (an old model), and more recently they focus on IoT devices and the partnership with Apple for iPhone emergency messaging. There isn’t a Globalstar smartphone; the competition here is more network vs network and Globalstar’s basic sat phone vs Thuraya One.

  • Coverage: Globalstar covers much of the continental United States, Canada, Caribbean, Europe, and parts of Asia and Australia, but it does not have global reach and notably lacks coverage in large parts of Africa, South Asia, and oceanic regions ts2.tech. It relies on ground stations, so if you’re not within range of a ground station footprint, you have no service. For instance, mid-ocean or polar areas are out, and even some land areas (like Central Africa or big parts of Russia/Asia) were historically uncovered. Thuraya’s coverage (EMEA/Asia) vs Globalstar’s (Americas/Europe fringe) are almost complementary opposites in some ways. If you’re in the Middle East or Africa, Thuraya is far superior since Globalstar is basically absent there. In the Americas, Globalstar works in many populated areas whereas Thuraya doesn’t at all. So the choice might simply depend on region: e.g., a user in Africa would pick Thuraya One, whereas someone in South America might lean to a Globalstar phone (or Iridium).
  • Device Technology: Globalstar’s GSP-1700 handset is very basic – a 2007-era design – just calling and texting with a small screen. It’s smaller and lighter than older Iridium phones (about 7 oz / 198 g), but also not rugged or waterproof at all ts2.tech. There is no smartphone functionality. Thuraya One obliterates it in terms of features (smartphone, apps, etc.). Globalstar doesn’t offer a dual-mode phone; it’s satellite-only when you have it. So again, Thuraya One is a far more capable device on the whole.
  • Voice Quality: Globalstar’s network historically had good voice quality (when in coverage) with low latency (also LEO but using a bent-pipe architecture to ground stations). However, earlier satellite failures meant some users experienced dropped calls or no availability at times in the past. Globalstar has since launched second-gen satellites and improved service. If you are in a strong coverage area, Globalstar calls can sound as clear as a cell call with minimal delay (a selling point was <60 ms latency in best cases ts2.tech). Thuraya voice quality is also clear, but with more delay (~1s). For casual conversation, Globalstar might feel more natural due to less delay, but its coverage gaps and network health have been issues historically.
  • Data: Globalstar data is extremely slow (9.6 kbps, or ~20 kbps with compression) ts2.tech, basically unusable beyond text emails. They do have a Sat-Fi2 hotspot that can do maybe 72 kbps. Thuraya’s roughly 60 kbps is similarly pokey – so both are not about data. Globalstar’s big new “data” play is piggybacking on devices like the Apple iPhone 14/15 for short text SOS messages (which is outside the consumer’s direct control, as it’s built into Apple’s service). Thuraya One doesn’t integrate with consumer phones – it is the phone.
  • Airtime Cost: Globalstar has tried to position as a cheaper alternative to Iridium. Their plans for voice can be more affordable, sometimes offering unlimited off-peak calling or cheaper per-minute rates, but with the caveat that you have to be in their coverage. For example, Globalstar often sells bundles like $65/month for unlimited minutes (domestic plans) – something Iridium would never do. Thuraya’s costs are moderate; possibly not as cheap per minute as some Globalstar promotional plans in the US, but Thuraya covers areas Globalstar doesn’t and vice versa. It’s hard to directly compare without region specifics.
  • Usage Scenarios: If someone primarily operates in North America and wants an affordable sat phone for emergency backup, a Globalstar phone is a viable alternative – and indeed, the Bullitt/Motorola Defy satellite devices for texting use Globalstar’s network? Actually, correction: Bullitt uses GEO satellites (Inmarsat and EchoStar) for texts, not Globalstar. However, rumor has it that some future Android phones might use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Satellite which partners with Iridium. Apple uses Globalstar. Thuraya One is aiming at those who need a more robust solution in EMEA/Asia.

So, Thuraya One vs Globalstar’s offering: if you are in Thuraya regions, Thuraya One is clearly better (because Globalstar likely won’t work there at all). If you are in Globalstar regions (e.g., US), Thuraya One can’t be used on satellite mode at all – you’d use it only as a normal phone. In that case, it makes no sense to buy a Thuraya One if you need satellite in the US – you’d pick Iridium or maybe a device that can leverage Globalstar (like an iPhone 14 for SOS or a SPOT communicator for basic messaging).

One might compare Thuraya One with upcoming Globalstar/Bullitt devices indirectly: e.g., Bullitt’s CAT S75 phone is a rugged Android phone that uses satellite for messaging in many of the same regions Globalstar covers (Bullitt’s current coverage includes North America, Europe, and more to come) bullitt.com. But the CAT S75’s satellite feature is limited to texts and emergency SOS – no voice calls. Thuraya One offers actual voice calls and real-time communication, which is a huge advantage for emergencies and coordination.

Thuraya One vs Bullitt Satellite Phones (CAT S75, Motorola Defy 2)

In 2023, Bullitt Group launched the Cat S75 and Motorola Defy 2, which are rugged Android smartphones that integrate Bullitt Satellite Connect service for messaging. These phones are perhaps the closest conceptually to Thuraya One, in that they combine cellular and satellite in one smartphone. However, the implementation and capabilities differ:

  • Satellite Service Type: Bullitt phones use geostationary satellites (Inmarsat and EchoStar) to provide two-way messaging and SOS, but not voice calls (at least initially). You can send text messages (and small attachments like location or compressed images) to any phone or email via the Bullitt Satellite Messenger app when you have no cellular signal. This is essentially a satellite OTT messaging service. Voice is not supported yet – Bullitt has mentioned that voice may come in the future as a VoIP call over satellite, but that’s not launched as of 2025. Thuraya One, conversely, is a true satellite phone – you can make actual voice calls and standard SMS over satellite right out of the box satellite-telecom.shop satellite-telecom.shop. This is a fundamental difference: Thuraya One offers real-time voice communication and works like a normal phone on satellite, whereas Bullitt’s solution is asynchronous messaging (like sending a text that might take 10-20 seconds to send via satellite and then the recipient replies etc.). For emergency or operational use, being able to have a voice conversation can be critical. On the other hand, satellite texting has the benefit of being usable even when you can’t commit to a voice call or if signal is weak.
  • Coverage: Bullitt’s satellite coverage (as of mid-2025) includes North America, most of Europe, and Australia/NZ, with expansion plans for other regions bullitt.com. They do not yet cover everywhere; notably, they mentioned rollout coming for Africa and Latin America in phases. This coverage is somewhat complementary to Thuraya’s, since Thuraya covers Africa/Middle East/Asia, while Bullitt covers North America/Europe/Aus. There is overlap in Europe/Australia where both can operate. If Bullitt eventually covers Africa and Asia, then it would overlap heavily with Thuraya, but that depends on their deals with Inmarsat. For now, if you’re in the U.S. or Canada, a Cat S75 will allow satellite texts, whereas Thuraya One’s sat won’t work there at all. Conversely, in say Kenya or India, Thuraya One works (satellite), but Bullitt’s service might not yet be available (and those countries might even restrict sat usage). So one might choose based on region too. Importantly, Bullitt relies on subscription – you need an active Bullitt Satellite Messenger plan (with a monthly fee) to use the feature, whereas Thuraya can be used with prepaid and doesn’t necessarily require constant subscription if you only need it occasionally (you could top-up when needed).
  • Device Hardware: The Cat S75 phone is a rugged Android (MIL-SPEC, IP68 etc.) with a 6.6″ display, MediaTek Dimensity 930 chip, 6 GB RAM, 128 GB storage – very similar core specs to Thuraya One (except different chip maker). It also has a 50 MP camera triple setup, 5000 mAh battery, etc. In a way, the Cat S75 and Motorola Defy 2 are similar class Android rugged phones but with the Bullitt satellite messaging feature integrated. They cost around $599 at launch, which is half the cost of Thuraya One. Part of that lower price is because their satellite function is far less complex (just text modem essentially, no voice transceiver). Also, Bullitt likely subsidizes hardware expecting to earn from subscriptions. So if budget is limited and messaging suffices, a Bullitt phone might appeal to consumers. Thuraya One is more for professionals needing a higher level of communication (voice, more immediate connectivity).
  • Satellite Antenna: Thuraya One has a retractable antenna for L-band. Bullitt’s phones cleverly use the normal phone antennas to communicate with GEO satellites for brief messages; they don’t have a visible antenna protrusion. This is convenient (looks like a normal phone) but also physics-limited: to send a message, you often have to hold the phone out and wait ~30 seconds for it to send. For voice, that wouldn’t sustain a call. Thuraya’s dedicated antenna allows continuous link for a call. So it’s a design trade-off: Bullitt is more “stealth” but limited in throughput.
  • Service and Reliability: Thuraya’s sat service is well-established with predictable performance (if you have a signal, you can call). Bullitt’s is new – early users of Cat S75 reported some growing pains with message send times or coverage holes as the service ramped up. Also, the messaging requires using their app and the recipient needs to either have the app or receive a conversion to SMS via a server. Thuraya’s calls or SMS go directly to any phone number (SMS to a cell might sometimes be unreliable, but generally it goes through or notifies you of failure). Also, if an emergency happens, on Thuraya One you can directly dial emergency numbers or any contact. On Bullitt, you have an SOS feature via a partner response center (similar to a Garmin InReach or PLB) – which is good for emergency, but you’re not directly talking to 911; it’s a text relay. So for real-time coordination, Thuraya One is superior. For basic check-ins and SOS signaling, Bullitt phones offer a cheaper solution for perhaps a broader consumer market.
  • Future Competition: We should note that mainstream phone makers are integrating satellite features too. Apple’s Emergency SOS (using Globalstar) is limited to emergency texting and is on millions of iPhones now, but not usable for normal messaging or calls. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Satellite (with Iridium) is slated to enable two-way texting on premium Android phones in 2024+. These trends indicate that simple satellite messaging might become a common feature, potentially reducing the need for dedicated devices for folks who only want occasional SOS capabilities. However, full-fledged satellite talk/data is a much bigger challenge, which is why Thuraya One stands relatively alone (the only other being Thuraya’s older X5-Touch and some niche Chinese hybrid phones).

In essence, Thuraya One vs Bullitt phones boils down to voice vs text. Thuraya offers real voice calls and a proven satellite service but at high cost, targeting professional users. Bullitt offers text-only satellite comms at a fraction of the price, aiming at outdoor enthusiasts and mainstream users who might not justify $1k+ for a sat phone. They occupy somewhat different tiers of the market. Interestingly, a user might even carry both: e.g., use a Cat S75 as a primary phone and have Thuraya One for voice in extreme cases. But likely one would choose based on their specific needs: if you frequently need to talk from remote areas, Thuraya One is the choice; if you mainly want a backup lifeline to say “I’m OK” or do occasional texts, a Bullitt solution could suffice.

Thuraya One vs Inmarsat and Others

Though not explicitly asked, it’s worth a brief mention of Inmarsat since they are a major satcom provider:

  • Inmarsat’s handheld, the IsatPhone 2, is a pure satellite phone (no cellular) that covers almost the entire globe except polar regions (like Thuraya, Inmarsat uses GEO satellites but they have multiple satellites covering different longitudes for global reach) ts2.tech ts2.tech. It’s cheaper (~$700) and very reliable for voice/SMS, but again, not a smartphone at all. Thuraya One offers a far richer feature set than IsatPhone 2 (which is like a durable “dumb” phone with a small screen and limited texting).
  • Inmarsat’s advantage is global coverage (except poles) with stable voice quality and relatively high battery life (8 hours talk) ts2.tech. But its data is slow (no broadband on handheld).
  • Thuraya One vs IsatPhone: if you need a basic global sat phone, IsatPhone 2 is good value. If you want an integrated smartphone with multi-mode, Thuraya One wins in capability if your region overlaps with Thuraya coverage.

Other rivals: There are a few niche devices (for example, some Chinese brands have made dual-mode phones using Thuraya or Chinese satellites, often for specific markets). Also, the company AST SpaceMobile is working on direct satellite-to-standard-cellphone service (they made a test satellite call via a regular unmodified phone in 2023). But those are still experimental or not commercially available to consumers yet. Over the next few years, we might see more convergence with SpaceX’s Starlink planning to provide text and eventually voice/data directly to ordinary 5G phones (T-Mobile partnership) sealingdevices.com. These developments could become competitors or at least alternatives to devices like Thuraya One in the future, but as of 2025 they are not yet in service. So Thuraya One currently stands out as one of the most advanced available solutions for satellite communication on a smartphone.

To summarize the competitive landscape:

  • Iridium phones: Best for absolute coverage and simplicity, but lack smartphone features. Thuraya One beats them on features, loses on global reach.
  • Globalstar phone: Cheaper and works in Americas/Europe, but has big coverage holes elsewhere and is technologically dated. Thuraya One is far superior in its region.
  • Bullitt/Cat S75: Innovative and affordable for sat messaging, but can’t do voice and is more for casual use. Thuraya One is a professional-grade tool with far greater capability (and cost).
  • Inmarsat IsatPhone: Solid near-global sat phone for voice, but again a single-use device. Thuraya One offers dual-use; IsatPhone might be a better pick only if you need its global range or a simpler lower-cost backup phone.
  • Future direct-to-phone services: On the horizon, could offer satellite messaging or calls on standard phones (e.g., leveraging Starlink or AST’s satellites). Those could become competitors, but for now, Thuraya One and similar sat devices fill the gap.

In any case, Thuraya One has carved a niche for itself: It’s currently the only device to combine 5G smartphone capability with genuine satellite telephony globalsatellite.us, making it a unique offering for 2025.

Recent News and Developments

The satellite communications field is evolving rapidly. Here are some of the recent news and developments up to 2025 that relate to Thuraya One and its competitive context:

  • Thuraya 4-NGS Satellite Launch (2025): As mentioned earlier, a major development for Thuraya was the successful launch of its new generation satellite, Thuraya-4 NGS, on January 3, 2025 spaceflightnow.com. This was SpaceX’s first orbital launch of 2025, indicating how significant it is for the region. The satellite will enhance Thuraya’s network capacity and coverage for the next decade. It comes after a partial outage of Thuraya-3 in 2024 spaceflightnow.com, so it is critical for restoring full service in Asia and providing a platform for improved services (possibly including higher data rates and new products). This launch is part of a broader modernization as Yahsat (Thuraya’s parent) invests in SpaceTech advancements to ensure users have seamless communication moving forward globalsatellite.us. For Thuraya One users, it means the network backing their device is getting stronger and more future-proof.
  • Thuraya One Launch and Reception (2024/2025): The Thuraya One itself was announced and rolled out in late 2024 to early 2025. Press releases and tech blogs around January 2025 covered it as the “world’s first 5G Android satellite smartphone” globalsatellite.us. The launch was somewhat low-key in mainstream media (since satellite phones are a niche), but within industry circles it was big news. Companies like Cygnus Telecom demoed the phone at trade shows and in unboxing videos, highlighting that it truly merges sat-phone functionality into an everyday device cygnus.co. By mid-2025, Thuraya One has started shipping to customers, and the stock is mainly available through specialized resellers (Global Satellite in the UK, Satellite Phone Store in the US albeit called “Skyphone”, etc.). Social media communities (like expedition forums) have had initial reports from users who took the Thuraya One on trips in 2025, generally confirming it performs as advertised.
  • Bullitt Satellite Messenger Service (2023–2024): Over the past two years, Bullitt’s satellite messaging initiative has been a notable development. In early 2023 at MWC, Bullitt announced the Cat S75 phone and Motorola Defy satellite devices, which officially made them the first to put two-way satellite messaging in a smartphone for general consumers. By mid-2023, these devices started shipping in Europe and North America. In 2024, Bullitt refined their service and also introduced a Bluetooth accessory (Motorola Defy Satellite Link) allowing any smartphone to use their sat messaging service skylo.tech. This trend is significant because it brought satellite connectivity into a sub-$100 gadget (the Defy satellite link) and into $600 phones, widening access. Bullitt reported being acquired by Motorola’s licensee in early 2024 (or at least a big partnership/ investment), and the service was up and running globally by then gpstraining.co.uk. For the industry, this signaled a shift: satellite connectivity is becoming more mainstream, albeit in a limited form (text). It likely spurred companies like Thuraya to ensure they stay ahead by offering more capable solutions like voice and higher integration (hence Thuraya One’s launch timing is apt).
  • Apple and Big Tech’s Satellite Moves (2022–2025): Apple’s introduction of Emergency SOS via satellite on iPhone 14 (late 2022) and continued with iPhone 15 has been a high-profile development. Using Globalstar’s satellites, Apple allows users in certain regions to send a distress text to emergency services when out of cell range. In 2023–2024, Apple expanded this to more countries and even added a roadside assistance via satellite feature in partnership with AAA in the US. While this doesn’t compete directly with Thuraya One (since it’s only for emergencies and only on iPhones), it does raise public awareness of satellite connectivity. People now expect that a phone can connect to satellites for help. The limitation is iPhone cannot be used for normal sat communications (no personal texts or calls). But rumor mills suggest Apple might consider expanding capabilities in future models or at least continue offering the SOS free for a couple of years, then maybe a paid plan. For Thuraya, this means more people might be interested in the idea of a phone that works off-grid, which could indirectly help their market, or could push them to innovate further to not be leapfrogged if Apple/others ever allow general messaging.
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon Satellite and Android OEMs (2023–2024): At CES 2023, Qualcomm and Iridium announced a partnership to bring satellite messaging to Android devices using Snapdragon chipsets. Throughout 2024, it’s been reported that some premium Android phones (possibly by Motorola, Xiaomi, etc.) will start having this feature, enabling similar SOS and basic messaging via the Iridium network. This basically is Android’s answer to Apple’s SOS. By 2025, we expect a few of those devices to be out, though widespread adoption may take time. This is a trend to watch: if many Android phones get satellite messaging as a standard feature, the value proposition of dedicated sat devices might shift more towards those who need voice and continuous connectivity (which Thuraya One provides). Qualcomm even mentioned the possibility of eventually supporting limited voice (maybe push-to-talk style) via satellite on future iterations, but that remains to be seen.
  • Emerging Satellite-Direct Cell Networks: Two startups, AST SpaceMobile and Lynk Global, have been working on satellites that connect directly to unmodified cell phones. In April 2023, AST SpaceMobile made headlines by completing the first-ever direct voice call from a regular smartphone to a satellite (to an AT&T number, using their BlueWalker 3 test satellite). They also managed a data session and have plans for a satellite constellation that could provide broadband to phones. Lynk has demonstrated texting to unmodified phones and is partnering with a few mobile operators for emergency messaging. SpaceX’s Starlink announced a plan with T-Mobile in 2022 to enable texting (and eventually voice) via Starlink satellites for T-Mobile customers, aiming to start beta perhaps in 2024/25. As of 2025, none of these are providing consumer service yet, but they are on the horizon. These “Direct-to-device” (D2D) satellite networks are considered a gamechanger in the next 5-10 years sealingdevices.com alliedmarketresearch.com. For Thuraya and similar, it means competition could arise if, say, five years from now your standard phone on a major carrier can just work anywhere via satellite fallback. However, the complexity and regulatory hurdles mean Thuraya One and dedicated sat phones will likely have their market secure for at least the medium term, especially for guaranteed, mission-critical use.
  • Market Trends: According to industry reports, the satellite phone market is growing steadily but modestly (a few percent CAGR) technavio.com, whereas the nascent direct-to-phone satellite market is projected to boom (potentially ~$2.5B in 2024 to $43B by 2034, if the tech pans out) alliedmarketresearch.com. This suggests that while specialized sat phones like Thuraya One will remain important for certain sectors (maritime, rescue, military, etc.), the big growth might come from mainstream integration. Thuraya’s strategy with One indicates they are aligning with the trend of convergence – offering a product that doesn’t feel separate from normal mobile tech. Experts in telecom forecast more hybrid network devices in coming years and possibly consolidation of services (e.g., one subscription that covers both cell and sat usage) sealingdevices.com. Yahsat (Thuraya’s owner) going public as Space42 and investing in AI and integration also hints at an ecosystem approach.
  • Upcoming Devices: As for upcoming models, there isn’t public info on a “Thuraya Two” yet (the name might be ironic if they did that, given “One” is the first). Thuraya likely will monitor the One’s success. They may consider a variant or a successor in a couple of years with improved specs or to leverage Thuraya-4’s new capabilities (maybe faster data or Ka-band?). Rivals: Iridium has not released a new handset in over a decade, but one rumor was that Iridium might develop a new phone to replace the 9555/9575 around the mid-2020s – nothing confirmed yet. Inmarsat could potentially plan an IsatPhone 3 or even a hybrid phone once their I-6 satellites and “Elera” network are fully online; no official word, but logically they might respond to Thuraya’s innovation to not lose market share in their regions. Bullitt might expand their lineup (perhaps a second-gen CAT S76 or more accessories). And interestingly, another company, Garmin, a leader in satellite emergency devices (inReach), has stuck to standalone messengers, but one wonders if they’d ever partner to put their tech in a phone or watch – not yet though.

In conclusion, the period of 2023–2025 has been one of the most dynamic in satellite phone industry history, due to the blend of new devices like Thuraya One and Cat S75 and big players entering the fray (Apple, Qualcomm, SpaceX). For consumers and professionals, it means more options to stay connected everywhere. The Thuraya One emerges in this context as a cutting-edge solution, offering something that until recently was science fiction: a smartphone that just works both on terrestrial 5G and satellites. It reflects the larger trend that “connectivity lies beyond towers, Wi-Fi and 5G maps”, as Thuraya’s own promo said thuraya.com. The boundaries between satellite and terrestrial networks are blurring, and Thuraya One is a tangible step into that future – ensuring that no matter where you go, your phone can keep you “one call away” from the rest of the world.

Market Outlook and Expert Insights

Looking ahead, experts see a robust if evolving future for satellite-enabled devices. The consensus is that demand for constant connectivity will drive innovation, and satellite communications will increasingly complement terrestrial networks rather than exist only as separate, specialized systems. Here are some parting insights:

  • Growing Adoption: While traditional satellite phone sales are relatively niche (~$1 billion market in 2024) businessresearchinsights.com, the integration of satellite tech into consumer devices is expected to explode. A report by Allied Market Research projects the direct satellite-to-phone market (including services like Apple’s, Qualcomm’s, etc.) to grow at ~32.7% annually through 2034 alliedmarketresearch.com. This suggests tens of millions of devices could have some satellite capability in the next decade. This rising tide could lift all boats — increasing awareness could also benefit specialized devices like Thuraya One, as more people realize the value of off-grid comms and look for more capable solutions.
  • Hybrid Network Services: We may see carriers or satellite operators offer bundled plans. For example, Thuraya (through parent Yahsat) might partner with regional mobile operators to offer a SIM that works on GSM normally and auto-switches to Thuraya sat for an extra fee when needed. In fact, Thuraya One’s existence makes such offerings more practical — as the hardware can handle both transparently. This could mitigate the high cost per minute by making it a seamless extension of normal service. Some experts predict satellite roaming deals becoming common, where your phone roams to a satellite network if no cell coverage (for a premium charge) sealingdevices.com. The groundwork is being laid by the likes of AST SpaceMobile and Lynk through partnerships with big mobile network operators.
  • Competition & Innovation: With players like SpaceX, AST, Iridium/Qualcomm entering the direct-to-phone arena, companies like Thuraya will need to continue innovating. Thuraya One is a strong entry in 2025, but imagine a future where a standard Samsung or Apple phone can make a satellite call (even if that’s 5+ years out). Thuraya’s advantage is owning its network; they can fine-tune the user experience (as seen with the always-on dual mode, etc.). Experts suggest that smaller GEO networks (Thuraya, Inmarsat) may focus on specialized high-reliability services and government/IoT, while LEO constellations (Starlink, Iridium, OneWeb in future) handle mass-market broadband and integration. Thuraya’s path, via Yahsat/Space42, seems to be innovating on products and perhaps eventually leveraging next-gen satellites to stay relevant. We might see a Thuraya Two or similar device down the line with improved battery or even broadband capabilities if technology allows.
  • User Education & Preparedness: A subtle point experts make is that having the tool is one thing; using it effectively is another. As satellite capability reaches more users, there’s an emphasis on educating users about how and when to use these features (for example, not waiting until a crisis to figure out how to point your phone to the sky). Thuraya and others produce content on “what satellite phones can do and who uses them” thuraya.com to broaden understanding. The hope is that as these devices become more common, they will save more lives and enable more productivity, but users should be aware of their limitations and proper operation.
  • Market Trends in Sectors: The defense sector remains a big user of satcom – expect continued procurement of devices like Thuraya One or its siblings for military and humanitarian missions, especially in areas where infrastructure is contested or destroyed. The energy sector (oil, gas, mining) will also continue to invest in reliable comms like this. Maritime is an area where some predict handheld sat phones might give way to small sat hotspots or built-in ship systems (e.g., VSAT or Elon Musk’s Starlink Maritime for big ships), but handhelds are still invaluable as personal safety devices on boats. For outdoor recreation, more affordable options (like the satellite messengers and Bullitt phones) might capture the casual hiking market, whereas serious expeditions (Everest climbs, polar treks) will likely still carry a true sat phone (for its independence and voice capability). Thuraya One could actually lure some high-end adventurers who used to carry an Iridium, offering them a richer device as long as their route stays in Thuraya regions.

In a quote from a TechHQ article on satellite connectivity, the author noted that after years of satellite phones being seen as only for “survivalists or niche professionals”, now “they’re becoming an everyday tool” for anyone who needs reliable communication beyond the reach of cell towers thuraya.com. The Thuraya One epitomizes this shift – packaging critical satellite links into a form factor familiar to all of us.

The coming years will be exciting for this industry. For now, in 2025, the Thuraya One stands as a pioneer – it demonstrates that one device can truly keep you connected everywhere (within a very large footprint), without forcing you to sacrifice the convenience and functionality of a modern smartphone. As long as one understands its limitations and cost, it is arguably the comprehensive communications gadget for those who live or work on the fringe of civilization.

As Thuraya’s tagline for the One suggests: “truly connected – even when coverage disappears” thuraya.com. This is a promise that, thanks to the confluence of advanced satellite tech and smartphone design, is now being delivered to end users like never before. The Thuraya One is thus not only an impressive device in its own right, but also a sign of where the industry is headed – towards a world where being off the grid no longer means being out of touch.

Sources:

Back to the list